Nicole Kidman, famed Aussie actress and alleged part-time porcelain doll model, has recently captured the attention of the world (via the paps) by appearing at a charity event without wearing a bra.  Amazingly, it was not the lack of underwear that caught the attention of the general public, but instead the fact that she has a surprisingly perky set for someone post-baby.

The myriad of bitter, jealous and saggy-boobed individuals out there have cried, as they say, foul.  Claiming that the famously wrinkle-free actress has explicitly stated that she is 100% natural and does not have any investment(s) in the nation's plastics trade.  Naturally (no puns intended), Kidman has of course, stated this historically... much prior to her careful navigation of her war chest across the red carpet at the recent charity event. (Needless to say, this charity was NOT themed along the lines of war or weapons of masturbation mass destruction).  Most male social commentators are yet to comment, likely due to the difficulty they face trying to work the keyboard with only one (rather jittery) hand.

Naturally, this is simply MORE publicity that Kidman would not want in the wake of being dumped from the upcoming comedy Monte Carlo in favour of a more "youthful" look - apparently achieved by her replacement: 17 year old Selena Gomez. << Having just clicked this link, you will appreciate the lack of words I have to describe how monstrously huge this was as a casting change.  However, it should be enough to state that the film's producers have been forced to re-work the script to have it focus upon a group of high-school/college girls traveling to Paris.

We have little doubt that Kidman is now hoping that the Monte Carlo edits will include a re-naming of the film, perhaps to: Taken 2: This time Liam Neeson cannot find shit.